<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\nDuring our engagement with the client, we offered a multi-step approach to tackle their problem. At the outset, we developed a thorough understanding of our client\u2019s requirements. A Document of Understanding (DOU) enclosing key features, search focus and search strategies etc., was then shared with them. Further, a kick-off call was conducted wherein the client agreed upon the project scope.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Post approval of the project scope, searches were conducted using a combination of multiple search strategies to capture the relevant prior arts. Additionally, German language keywords were also used to conduct searches to eliminate machine translation-related errors. Frequent interim reports were shared with the client and next steps were agreed upon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
After identification of the relevant prior arts, a search report was prepared containing detailed mapping of the identified documents with respect to the claim elements. Further communications with the client were carried out to clarify any doubts or receive suggestions pertaining to the search. Notably, Sagacious IP performed the Silver Bullet Invalidity Search<\/strong> for the client. This is a contingency-based service wherein the client pays full amount only if the killer prior art is identified.<\/p>\n\n\n\nNotably, the set of patents and NPLs identified during the invalidity search were first reviewed then analysed manually. At the end of the project, Sagacious IP shared the final findings in an MS word report (tailored with relevant and related patents) for an internal meeting at client site. After the first meeting, their team reached us back with specific questions regarding interpretation of certain technical aspects. In response to these questions, Sagacious IP\u2019s team shared a follow-up feedback that helped the client convince all the internal stakeholders that the relevant prior arts had been identified.<\/p>\n\n\n\n