<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\nDirected Prosecution is a high-value process that can be performed in various ways \u2013 most efficient being the use of a specification chart.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In simple terms, a specification chart is a mapping of the specifications against a product\/service of interest. This chart is quite similar to an Evidence of Use (EoU) chart. The main difference between the two, however, is that the mapped elements cover the complete specification and not just claims in a specification chart. This chart essentially gives an overview of the elements that are mentioned in a product\/service of interest. The only prerequisite is that the patent family should be kept open*.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
*P<\/em>atents with an open family are the ones that have at least one family member under prosecution.<\/em><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<\/span>How to Create a Specification Chart?<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\nFirst, the features of an invention need to be identified. Since doing this requires familiarity with product offerings by competitors, it is mainly done by IP experts. Next, the embodiments (paragraphs) in the specifications defining the elements corresponding to the features of the invention are identified. Lastly, the identified embodiments are mapped to the information from product documentations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/span>How It Saves Cost<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\nPatent prosecution is a costly affair. So, if there are any rejections during the process, the specification chart can provide insights into all the possible directions the prosecution can be steered to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Most of the competing products\/services are quite similar in features. Hence, mapping the specifications against the product with the most matching product documentation has a high probability of covering other competing products as well. Such an exhaustive mapping eventually helps in saving costs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n