{"id":448,"date":"2021-05-31T01:58:00","date_gmt":"2021-05-31T01:58:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sagaciousresearch.com\/blog\/?p=448"},"modified":"2025-11-27T07:55:30","modified_gmt":"2025-11-27T07:55:30","slug":"draft-patent-applications-post-alice-era","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sagaciousresearch.com\/blog\/draft-patent-applications-post-alice-era","title":{"rendered":"Draft Patent Applications in the Post-Alice Era"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The Alice case sets a precedent in inventions related to Intellectual Property (IP) <\/strong>and software. Under the fresh, more rigid norm, district and appeal courts have invalidated<\/a><\/strong> more than 370 software patents<\/strong>. Moreover, they rejected two out of three patent apps brought before them since the Alice judgment. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Post Alice, a spur occurred in the number of 101 rejections in every Technology Centre (TC)<\/strong>. The % value in the graph below indicates the total number of cases handled by the TC. These cases were rejected under 101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

However, the change in patent norms has altered the current landscape<\/strong>. Innovators are considering changing the approach to maximize both patent and trade investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Given the trouble of obtaining patent permission, to draft patent applications<\/strong> becomes a little confusing and technical to an innovator<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Also Read: 4 Best Practices for Background Writing While Drafting a Patent Application<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Table of Contents<\/p>\n