Continuation Patent Application Vs. Continuation-In-Part – Which Is Better And Why

Continuation Vs. Continuation-In-Part Patent Application – Which Is Better And Why?

Continuation application, Continuation-in-parts Application, and Divisional Applications are all categorized under the “parent application” type.

In this article, we will elaborate on Continuation application and Continuation-in-parts application. This will give you a better perspective about the advantages and disadvantages of filing the two.

Continuations-in-Part Application

A Continuation-in-part (CIP) Application is an application which we file during the lifetime of an earlier filed non-provisional application. And, in addition to that, it includes some substantial portion, or all, of the earlier non-provisional application. It also includes additional subject matter not disclosed in the earlier non-provisional application. 

It is, sometimes times, also known as an “add on” to an existing patent application.

The continuation-in-part application claims the benefit of the prior non-provisional application. And, it should have at least one inventor in common with the previously filed non-provisional application.

When to File a CIP application?

An important point to note is that any claim of the CIP application that includes the newly added subject matter will have a priority date. This date is corresponding to the filing date of the CIP application.

Therefore, we should file CIP application only when newly filed subject matter and corresponding claims cannot work without the subject matter disclosed in the earlier filed non-provisional application. And, if filed as a separate application, then the separate application has chances of facing rejection under obviousness based on the earlier filed non-provisional application.

Also, while writing the CIP application, the writer should not include any independent claim. That is, one which is solely based on the claims of earlier non-provisional application to avoid the double patenting rejection.

Therefore, it is advisable to have independent claims which includes at least one feature of the newly added subject matter.

Continuation Application

A continuation application is an application which we file for the invention disclosed in a prior-filed co-pending non-provisional application or an international application designating the United States. The disclosure presented in the continuation application must not include any new subject matter.

Further, the continuation application must include at least one inventor named in the prior-filed application. And, moreover, the continuation application must also claim the benefit of the prior-filed application.

When to File a Continuation Application?

A continuation application is usually filed before the patenting, abandonment, or termination of proceedings on an earlier application.

An applicant may have a recourse to filing a continuation application in order to introduce a new set of claims and to establish a right to further examination by the Office. For example, continuation applications are used when an applicant wants to pursue additional claims of an earlier application.

The continuation application may be useful when the applicant feels the earlier application does not have claims for all useful embodiment of the invention. Accordingly, the continuation application allows an applicant to keep a tendency of the patent family alive to pursue new claims against competitors and future design-around products.

Further, an applicant can file a continuation application if the examiner is ready to grant the patent application with narrow claims but has objections on granting the broader claims. In such a case, an applicant can accept a granted patent with narrow claims, and then pursue a continuation application for the broader claims.

However, in such cases, the applicant must file the continuation application before paying the grant fee of the earlier patent.

Accordingly, the continuation application allows an applicant to keep a tendency of the patent family alive. This, in turn, helps to pursue new claims against competitors and future design-around products.

-Yojit Bhugra and Pankaj Garg (Patent Drafting & Prosecution) and the Editorial Team

Related Resources

Click here to know more about the Patent drafting service offered by Sagacious IP or contact us here.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *